<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Naffziger's Blog &#187; Seattle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naffziger.net/blog/category/seattle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naffziger.net/blog</link>
	<description>Startups, Search &#38; Seattle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Aggregating Microstock data &#8211; LookStat</title>
		<link>http://www.naffziger.net/blog/2008/10/29/aggregating-microstock-data-lookstat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naffziger.net/blog/2008/10/29/aggregating-microstock-data-lookstat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Naffziger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreamstime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotolia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IStockphoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lookstat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naffziger.net/blog/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more and more of our data moves to the cloud, it frequently gets scattered across different sites. As much as I love data, aggregating and normalizing it is a pain. I have been an advocate of Yodlee for nearly a decade, and have become so accustomed to it that I can&#8217;t imagine how people [...]<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more and more of our data moves to the cloud, it frequently gets scattered across different sites.  As much as I love data, aggregating and normalizing it is a pain.   I have been an advocate of Yodlee for nearly a decade, and have become so accustomed to it that I can&#8217;t imagine how people manage their finances or frequent flyer accounts without it.</p>

<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-click"><div class="mceTemp"><dl class="wp-caption alignright" style=""><dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28851456@N00/2282340791" rel="nofollow" mce_ href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28851456@N00/2282340791"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3021/2282340791_e3da7e8436_m.jpg" alt="Stock Photography Shoot" title="Stock Photography Shoot" width="240" height="160"/></a></dt><dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Sample Microstock by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28851456@N00/2282340791" rel="nofollow" >keitheddleman</a></dd></dl></div></div>

<p>Microstock (stock photos that cost &lt;$10 per photo) has become an increasingly large business and is rapidly <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/04/01/8403372/index.htm" rel="nofollow" >tearing the $2B traditional stock photography business to shreds</a>.  There are probably close to a fifty thousand individual photographers contributing photos to sites like <a href="http://www.istockphoto.com" rel="nofollow" >istockphoto</a>, <a href="http://www.fotolia.com" rel="nofollow" >fotolia</a> and <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com" rel="nofollow" >dreamstime</a>. </p>



<p>If you are a photographer, you&#8217;ll submit your images to multiple sites: the sites are non-exclusive, it costs nothing to submit a photo and it increases your chance of selling the photo (which can be sold multiple times). But tracking the performance of your photos is very challenging - you need to download data files from multiple sites, normalize them and then somehow link the photo-by-photo performance data from the different sites.  </p>

<p><a href="http://www.rp0229.com/blog" rel="nofollow" >Rahul</a> and <a href="http://blog.zednick.name/" rel="nofollow" >Casey Zednick</a> just launched <a href="http://www.lookstat.com" rel="nofollow" >LookStat</a>, a must use application for serious microstock photographers.  Not only do they aggregate the data from multiple sites, but they also do the very hard work of normalizing your data.  That means that you can see how much a single photo is making across all sites.</p>

I fully expect that LookStat becomes an essential application for photographers. Congrats on the launch!<p>a</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naffziger.net/blog/2008/10/29/aggregating-microstock-data-lookstat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechFlash &#8211; Full Feeds Please!</title>
		<link>http://www.naffziger.net/blog/2008/10/23/techflash-full-feeds-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naffziger.net/blog/2008/10/23/techflash-full-feeds-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Naffziger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puget Sound Business Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle PI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Post-Intelligencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechFlash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Bishop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naffziger.net/blog/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Seattle tech news scene has long been dominated by two bloggers: John Cook and Todd Bishop. Both were formerly writers/bloggers at the Seattle PI, and both left at the same time to launch TechFlash with/for The Puget Sound Business Journal. Although the site launched on 10/21, it seems that they&#8217;ve both been writing for [...]<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Seattle tech news scene has long been dominated by two bloggers: <a href="http://www.techflash.com/about#john" rel="nofollow" >John Cook</a> and <a href="http://www.techflash.com/about#todd" rel="nofollow" >Todd Bishop</a>.  Both were formerly writers/bloggers at the Seattle <span class="caps">PI, </span>and both left at the same time to launch <a href="http://www.techflash.com/" rel="nofollow" >TechFlash</a> with/for The Puget Sound Business Journal.</p>

<p>Although the site launched on 10/21, it seems that they&#8217;ve both been writing for a while and are in the process of publishing back posts (either that or they soft-launched back in September). </p>

<p>There were a number of things that disappointed me about their prior coverage, and I hope now that they are free from the restrictions of a big media news organization like the PI they&#8217;ll become better bloggers. Anyway, here are my suggestions for making TechFlash even better:</p>


<ol>
<li><strong>Full feeds.</strong>  No respectable tech news source sends out partial <span class="caps">RSS </span>feeds. Attention is way more valuable than the incremental page views.  I spend way more time reading the other publications on John Cook&#8217;s Feeds list than I have on his blog at the <span class="caps">PI. </span> Full-length feeds are a big part of that. If partial-feeds are a must, then at least write a paragraph feed summary - don&#8217;t just take the first 30 words&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Opinion.</strong>  Please provide some.  If all we wanted to know was what a company did, we could visit their website. Tell us if they will be successful or if they&#8217;ll flop or what you think of their offering.  </li>
<li><strong>Unique.</strong>  Guest bloggers are great, but don&#8217;t just reprint their content. I subscribe to <a href="http://asack.typepad.com/" rel="nofollow" >Andy Sack&#8217;s blog</a>. I read his original post on <a href="http://asack.typepad.com/a_sack_of_seattle/2008/10/venture-firms-closed-for-the-holidays.html" rel="nofollow" >venture over the holidays</a> last week.  I really don&#8217;t need to see <a href="http://www.techflash.com/venture/Guest_post_VCs_are_out_for_the_holidays.html" rel="nofollow" >the same thing</a> twice in my feeds (yes, even though it was a good post).</li>
</ol>



Regardless of whether or not they implement these feeds, I&#8217;m definitely excited for the increased depth that Techflash can provide.<p>a</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naffziger.net/blog/2008/10/23/techflash-full-feeds-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

